Damn Dirty Ape!
So I have to weigh in on this one. Some time ago, the NY Post printed a cartoon. Like most political cartoons it addressed what was happening in politics at the time. Makes sense. But this one has caused a lot of outrage and while I also am ashamed of this ad, it's for a much different reason. For starters here's the cartoon.
I am kind of confused by this cartoon. I guess it's trying to say that an ape wrote the US's current "economic stimulus" (have we had enough of these words) bill. That's a pretty wealthy ape or at least a very powerful ape.
I say good for him or her. Writing a complicated bill like that would be a chore for any of us. Why not give the job to an ape? Take affirmative action to a new level.
Maybe it's one of those super intelligent apes from NASA. Did you ever think of that?
But to add to my confusion I wondered: why would police or security guards shoot an ape for writing a stimulus bill on a street in broad daylight with lots of witnesses driving by? Was the bill that bad? Doesn't it stimulate you enough? Do the editors of the NY Post want people to go to the zoo and shoot apes? Maybe they should shoot the greedy (suicide?) or economists instead since they are the real problem.
But back to the uproar. People think this dead ape is a stand-in for Barack Obama. This is a bit of a stretch. First of all Barack Obama is a homo (wait for it) sapien. But apparently people of African descent are considered apes or monkeys by silly racist people.
(As a side note, in Europe if you have black football players on your national team almost every country will make monkey calls at them. Hey fat, lazy, drunk white guys! Those footballers could probably kick your balls out of the stadium! Get a life.)
And do people actually think Barack Obama wrote the bill himself? Clearly not. I think this is a case of reading into things too much. I'm sure the NY Post has apologized for any offense by now.
The funny thing is that his predecessor was often portrayed as an ape himself. I read the Guardian on occasion and have greatly enjoyed political cartoons by Steve Bell. Bell's Bush is terribly simian and funny. How is portraying Bush in this way acceptable and just drawing a picture of an ape, far from having Obama swinging from tree to tree on the White House lawn, racist?
Even if you don't believe in evolution like our friend Bush, we're all still descended from apes in Africa.
And that's the real problem. It's not that this is another example of racism (I'm not disputing that by the way), it's that apes are demeaned by this cartoon and our culture more generally. Apes are apes and humans are humans, trees are trees and bacteria are bacteria. There isn't a hierarchy of intelligence or feeling or any of that shit we've been taught since we were kids. If God told you that, then God is wrong. We are all equal, all creation, all species on this earth and we all have a right to be here.
Apes, far from stupid, are too smart to waste their time developing a global economy and huge, bloated governments let alone writing an economic stimulus bill. Life is straightforward for them. Eat, fuck, shit, die, repeat.
Homo sapiens like the editor of the NY Post, Barack Obama and the racist football fan could learn a lot from them and pretty much every single other being on this earth.
Labels: Race(?)
1 Comments:
If everything (even bacteria) is completely equal then don't you think it is unjust to take penicillin when you have an infection?
After all that would be murder because the bacteria have as much right to exist as you do.
Or to put it another way...what happens if you develop athletes feet?
The fungus (now that it has infected your feet) has every right to exist as you do. It can't help the fact it developed on your feet.
Washing your feet in this case would be murder whereas it is a relatively minor annoyance to put up with the itch from the fungal infection.
The aforementioned example kind of puts everything in perspective if you really consider it.
Hell you could go so far as to call vegans murderers because they are viscously killing innocent plants and devouring the plants corpse for sustenance.
But then of course a plant can't be innocent...or evil for that matter. It's just a dumb plant.
The point is, saying "every living thing is equal" or "every organism has a right to life" means nothing.
You could turn around and say I shouldn't be so ridiculous but the problem is you *did* say *everything* has a right to life
Suddenly drawing a line in the sand and saying "well now, don't be ridiculous" would be hypocritical.
So the options are "everything has a right to life" which is absurd, "nothing has a right to life" which would make you a nihilist, or there is the option that only *some* organisms have a right to life.
Personally I prefer the measurement of intelligence and the developed senses of the species in question as a guide to the rights an organism has.
For example an organism that has language sufficient to communicate abstract thought is obviously more entitled then your standard cattle.
Furthermore an organism that can sense and respond (in self-preservation) to the destruction of it's being can obviously feel pain. Therefore it at the very least deserves a "humane" death if it is being killed for consumption.
Another example might be mental perception. An organism that is self-aware and can make inferences about the perceptions of others (which are distinct from itself) deserves special status as compared to say...a chicken waiting to be eaten.
Of course if a *highly* advanced species, hundreds of thousands of years of evolution ahead of us showed up tomorrow and decided humans would make good livestock--well--I might just change my mind. :P
10:01 PM
Post a Comment
<< Home