Sucks to Be Him
If ever there was a lopsided trial truly this is it. The fitting expression "Zacarias Moussaoui versus the People" springs to mind. With his life in the balance, he is essentially squaring off against an entire nation. I have the feeling that if the prosecutors could, they would subpoena every single American to come and tell their fellows about the trauma of 9/11. And no one would even notice if the trial took 20 years.
Even the dead are testifying against him. To coincide with the trial, many tapes are finally being released of 911 calls and calls from hijacked airplanes (isn't it impossible to make a cell phone call from an airplane). How can you fight the dead? Today Rudy Giuliani testified about his experiences that fateful day and expect more of the same in the days and weeks to come. Hasn't the case against Moussaoui been made?
What's the point of this parade/charade? It must have something to do with national healing and the closely related need to find a scapegoat (and then tear him apart). I'd love to come up with a biblical quote. I probably could from the Old Testament but Jesus was pretty clear that we should turn the other cheek to those that harm us. Don't expect this message to be heard in any of the churches of the red states. Sad that . . .
Beyond national healing and the slaughter of scapegoats, the timing is suspect. Iran's D-Day is pending and it's always good to get the emotions swelling. Hey Moussaoui is a brown guy and so are the Iranians; he hurt us, let's not give them the chance to hurt us. Atom bombs to the rescue then back to the couch and prime time.
Unlike many of the witnesses, I don't think Moussaoui is the devil. He's just a screwed up guy. They'll never allow it but given his behaviour I would speculate as to his mental health and ability to comprehend what is happening to him. This might spare him a lethal injection or worse but have no doubt that the conclusion to this trial has already been set: he's a dead man.
Maybe then the real healing can begin.
1 Comments:
i think you're spot on, thom. it's about national healing and scapegoating. which, really, is kind of an understandable need. it reminds me of the trials castro held when he came to power. he tried some former batista officials, not in a courtroom, but in a football stadium. more people could witness, more public sharing of grievance and hurt. the purpose wasn't exactly justice, but healing of national trauma. as nasty as the batista mofos were, that was hardly a fair trial either. i think, of the few dozen people tried, all but 2 were executed by firing squad (but don't quote me on that).
i also agree that moussaoui probably isn't fit to stand trial. but americans need blood, and they'll get it. while you or i may personally disagree with it, i don't think we could say for sure that canadians, or any other national collective, wouldn't feel the same way.
7:55 PM
Post a Comment
<< Home